Entain Exits CEE: What Does This Mean for the Gaming Industry?
AI-GENERATEDGaming giant Entain, known for brands like bwin, is withdrawing from the Croatian and Polish markets. Rising taxes and stricter regulations led to this decision.
What happened
Entain, one of the world's largest online gaming providers, is beginning a phased withdrawal from its Central and Eastern European (CEE) operations. The company recently confirmed this. Specifically, it concerns activities in Poland, where Entain is present through STS, and in Croatia, where the group operates SuperSport. The decision was not entirely unexpected. There had been rumors in the industry for some time. Now it is official. The markets in Croatia and Poland were long considered profitable for international operators. However, the framework conditions are changing. And apparently so drastically that even a heavyweight like Entain is drawing consequences. This is a clear signal to the entire industry. We at Lisa Lustich also follow such developments closely. After all, they influence the entire gaming sector. And indirectly, German players too. The departure from these countries is a strategic move. Entain probably wants to focus on other, more lucrative regions. Or on markets with more stable or less restrictive regulatory environments. This is a typical reaction of large corporations. They adapt their strategy to global and local changes.
Background
The main reason for Entain's decision is the tightening tax policy in these countries. Both Croatia and Poland aim to increase the taxation of gambling providers. This is done to generate higher state revenues. At the same time, the domestic market is to be better protected. For international operators like Entain, this means higher operating costs. Profit margins are shrinking. A business that hardly pays off becomes unattractive. In Poland, this can be seen with STS. In Croatia, with SuperSport. Both brands are established. Nevertheless, operations apparently no longer yield sufficient returns. Such tax adjustments are often part of a larger regulatory overhaul. Many states are trying to gain more control over the online gambling market. The German GGL is also taking this path. It wants to curb the black market. And protect players. However, increased tax pressure can also be counterproductive. It could drive providers underground. Or lead players to resort to unregulated offerings. This is a tightrope walk for any legislature. Entain has made a clear calculation here. Long-term profitability is paramount. If political conditions become too unfavorable, one takes stock. And leaves. We know this from other industries as well. Companies choose the optimal locations.
Why it matters for German players
Directly, Entain's withdrawal from Central and Eastern Europe has no immediate impact on German players. Since 2021, German players have been bound by the German State Treaty on Gambling. They only play with providers that hold a GGL license. That is a clear matter. However, conclusions can be drawn from this news. It shows how sensitive the gambling market reacts to political decisions. For German players, this means: the regulated market in Germany is attractive for established providers. Otherwise, they would not apply for GGL licenses. Strict regulation in Germany comes at a price. However, it also offers legal certainty for operators. And especially for players. In our editorial office, we see such developments as a sign. The gambling market is constantly in motion. New laws, new markets, new taxes. All of this shapes the landscape. Players should always ensure that they only play with licensed providers. This protects them from fraud. And guarantees that winnings are paid out. A safe harbor is always better than rough seas. Therefore, German players are well advised to adhere to the requirements of the Joint Gambling Authority of the Federal States. Unsafe foreign markets are not an option.
What it means for GGL-licensed casinos
For online casinos with a GGL license such as JackpotPiraten, Merkur-Slots, Loewen Play, or Crazybuzzer, Entain's withdrawal represents an indirect advantage. It shows that a stable and transparent regulatory environment is worth its weight in gold. Even if the German requirements are strict. Planning certainty for companies is given. They know where they stand. This is better than constant changes in tax laws. Or unclear regulations. The GGL creates a reliable basis here. This attracts reputable providers. And deters disreputable ones. German casinos therefore benefit from this stability. They can concentrate on their core business. Namely, offering attractive and secure gaming experiences. Without fear of sudden tax surprises. Player trust is crucial here. And this trust grows when operators operate within a clear legal framework. The German market, despite its strict rules, is a growth market. The GGL is working to make it even more attractive. Both for players and for providers. We at Lisa Lustich are also curious to see how the strategies of large corporations will develop in the future. Who invests in which markets? Who withdraws? It remains exciting.
Frequently asked questions
Why is Entain withdrawing from Central and Eastern Europe?
Entain is withdrawing from Poland and Croatia due to increasing taxes and stricter regulations that raise operating costs and shrink profit margins. These changes make the business less profitable for international operators.
Which brands does Entain operate in the affected countries?
In Poland, Entain is present through the brand STS. In Croatia, the group operates the brand SuperSport. Both brands are established, but their operation is apparently no longer sufficiently profitable.
What are the main reasons for the stricter tax policies in Croatia and Poland?
Governments in Croatia and Poland aim to generate higher state revenues through increased taxes on gambling operators and simultaneously better protect their domestic markets. This leads to higher operating costs for international operators.
What are the implications of Entain's withdrawal for German players?
The withdrawal has no immediate impact on German players, who are bound by the German Interstate Treaty on Gambling and play only with providers holding a GGL license. However, the development illustrates how sensitive the market is to political decisions.
What does Entain's withdrawal mean for online casinos with a GGL license in Germany?
For GGL-licensed casinos, the withdrawal is an indirect advantage, highlighting the attractiveness of a stable and transparent regulatory environment. The predictability and legal certainty of the German market draw in reputable providers.
Share
About the author

Lisa Lustich
Editor-in-chief & casino tester
Lisa Lustich has been testing German-language online casinos since 1997 and runs the Lustich.de newsroom. More than 400 published reviews, certified player-protection advisor (BZgA training, 2019).
All articles by Lisa Lustich →Sources & further reading
Whitelist of permitted online operators
Editorial guidelines Lustich.de
BZgA problem-gambling helpline: 0800 1 372 700
Gambling can be addictive. Please play responsibly. Help and counselling at 0800 1 372 700 (BZgA, free & anonymous).
Related topics
Further Reading
AI-GENERATEDGlobal Ambition: Betty Appoints Joel Wilson to Spearhead International Growth
Canadian iGaming brand Betty has hired Joel Wilson as VP of Capital Markets to drive its global expansion strategy following a successful launch in Ontario.
AI-GENERATEDChange at Casino Interlaken: New Management for Gaming Operations
Mayke Wolf has been appointed as the new CEO of Casino Interlaken AG. She succeeds Oliver Grimm, who stepped down at the end of September.
AI-GENERATEDCrypto Gaming Review: FoxSlots Attracts Players with 11,500 Games and High Limits
FoxSlots is leveraging blockchain networks for rapid payouts of up to €40,000 per month. However, its lack of a German GGL license raises regulatory concerns.











